Yesterday on Twitter, a very public figure posted the following:
...yet the opposition felt it necessary to still harass me with old gibberish....
odd? perhaps. transparent? you betcha'!
While the overtones may point to a political figure, with the phrase you betcha' suggesting a certain former governor, it was in fact the work of the famously unemployed Charlie Sheen. What's most alarming about Sheen's Twitter postings is not how crazy they are but rather how lucid. For example, there was this posting, also from yesterday:
Ready for my next fastball, world? PLAN BETTER
Applies to everything where an excuse now sits. Try it.
U won't be wrong. Ever.
From almost any other person, this would seem like really good advice. Coming from Charlie Sheen, I'll have to give it some thought. Of course, since Sheen tells us we can't process him with a normal brain, perhaps the best option is to just enjoy the show.
Friday, March 4, 2011
Thursday, March 3, 2011
"Train Monkey" or "Where There's a Will There's a What?"
When I lived near Philadelphia, I took trains very frequently. Some of it was a practical matter, dictated by the combination of living in the suburbs and having a job in the city but no car (or driver's license, for that matter, until my 20s). While there were times when I wished the trains ran a little later or more often, any frustrations were generally offset by the dual pleasures of not being stuck in traffic and being able to get more reading done.
Put another way, though there were times I wished the train was more convenient, I certainly never felt it intruded on my freedom. This is a large why I find George Will's recent Newsweek column about "Why Liberals Love Trains" so bizarre. In dismissing the efforts of the Obama administration to foster the development of high-speed rail service in America, Will asserts that progressives' real goal is not improving the environment or reducing traffic congestion but rather "diminishing Americans’ individualism in order to make them more amenable to collectivism."
He goes on to claim that progressives believe that, "the best thing about railroads is that people riding them are not in automobiles, which are subversive of the deference on which progressivism depends." In other words, liberals love trains because they hate freedom - a nonsensical thought which makes me wonder what America Mr. Will has been living in for the past decade.
In October of 2001, I needed to get from Washington to Philadelphia to rendezvous with a colleague but really didn't want to fly so soon after "9/11". My wife and I only had one car between us, so driving wasn't an option, which led to me taking Amtrak for the first time in several years. It was easy, relaxing and, though I was never once being scanned or searched, I felt absolutely secure. More to the point, I felt free.
On the return leg of the trip, my colleague and I parted ways at the Philadelphia airport. As he headed off to catch his flight back to Atlanta, I went to catch a SEPTA train back to 30th Street Station. Walking through the airport, I noticed soldiers patrolling the corridors with automatic weapons at the ready. This was the least safe I felt in the entirety of 2001. In contrast, whenever I take the train to New York, I don't have to worry about airports or parking or anything other than how comfortable my shoes are. In short, I feel free.
Like everyone, Mr. Will is entitled to his own opinions but not his own facts. The fact is that air travel in this day and age is about anything but freedom and between rising gas prices and increased congestion auto travel isn't that much better. And while Will is happy to lambaste federal subsidies for trains, he conveniently ignores that the road systems that make large-scale auto travel are supported by our tax dollars. Is that really the freedom to which anyone, even George Will, should aspire?
Put another way, though there were times I wished the train was more convenient, I certainly never felt it intruded on my freedom. This is a large why I find George Will's recent Newsweek column about "Why Liberals Love Trains" so bizarre. In dismissing the efforts of the Obama administration to foster the development of high-speed rail service in America, Will asserts that progressives' real goal is not improving the environment or reducing traffic congestion but rather "diminishing Americans’ individualism in order to make them more amenable to collectivism."
He goes on to claim that progressives believe that, "the best thing about railroads is that people riding them are not in automobiles, which are subversive of the deference on which progressivism depends." In other words, liberals love trains because they hate freedom - a nonsensical thought which makes me wonder what America Mr. Will has been living in for the past decade.
In October of 2001, I needed to get from Washington to Philadelphia to rendezvous with a colleague but really didn't want to fly so soon after "9/11". My wife and I only had one car between us, so driving wasn't an option, which led to me taking Amtrak for the first time in several years. It was easy, relaxing and, though I was never once being scanned or searched, I felt absolutely secure. More to the point, I felt free.
On the return leg of the trip, my colleague and I parted ways at the Philadelphia airport. As he headed off to catch his flight back to Atlanta, I went to catch a SEPTA train back to 30th Street Station. Walking through the airport, I noticed soldiers patrolling the corridors with automatic weapons at the ready. This was the least safe I felt in the entirety of 2001. In contrast, whenever I take the train to New York, I don't have to worry about airports or parking or anything other than how comfortable my shoes are. In short, I feel free.
Like everyone, Mr. Will is entitled to his own opinions but not his own facts. The fact is that air travel in this day and age is about anything but freedom and between rising gas prices and increased congestion auto travel isn't that much better. And while Will is happy to lambaste federal subsidies for trains, he conveniently ignores that the road systems that make large-scale auto travel are supported by our tax dollars. Is that really the freedom to which anyone, even George Will, should aspire?
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
Bordering on Ridiculous
Since Borders' unsurprising bankruptcy announcement last month, many people have weighed in on where the company went wrong and what the future holds for them and the book business in general. Some of it has been interesting and thoughtful, even in areas where I think the commentators are wrong, but a lot of it has been petty and distasteful. In particular, I'm thinking of the wave of "serves them right because they put so many others out of business" schadenfreude.
At its early-to-mid 90s best, when I had the pleasure of working with some of the brightest people I'll ever know (many of whom remain friends), Borders bridged the gap between chain-store selection and independent store knowledge. At that time at least, Borders didn't set out to destroy anyone's livelihood, they set out to be the best book/music-store they could be. Did stores go out of business after Borders stores opened nearby? Sometimes they did. Sometimes, they expanded as happened with the independent record store a block or so down Lancaster Avenue from my old store in Bryn Mawr shortly after the music department opened.
The reason that Borders' first store in Delaware, which I helped set up twice (long story), did such great business when it opened in November 1994 was because the people living around it were eager for a store with a knowledgeable staff and a good selection. Nothing leading up to that point precluded anyone from opening a good independent store nearby. Borders did what a good businesses are supposed to do, take advantage of an opportunity to give people what they want (or need, if you think of books and music the way I do). That's what Borders did and did well through the mid-90s. What they did the past decade is a different story, but it doesn't invalidate the benefit to the many people who found books, music and moves they never might have experienced if Borders hadn't helped connect them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)